MID
LANCASHIRE
Area
News –
Autumn
08 Number
89
ULNES
WALTON Footpath Number 8
Earlier this year Area an article was included in Area
News about the erosion that is taking place on the south bank of the River
Lostock at Grid Ref 513196 (to the east of Ulnes Walton Bridge on Ulnes
Walton Lane near the junction of Holker Lane), which is causing users of
the public footpath problems. If you would like a copy of this article
then please contact me. We had expected that a public inquiry about a
diversion of the footpath away from the River Lostock in order to provide
a footbridge, which the RA supports would be held during 2008. We have
still not heard a date for the public inquiry, which probably means that
the inquiry will not now be held until 2009. The authorities can sometimes
proceed at a very slow pace.

This is the
location where a new footbridge is desired. The footpath is at the end of
ditch next to the River Lostock, which involves users climbing down to the
bottom of the ditch and then climbing out on the other side, which is only
for the most agile of walkers. A footbridge used to exist by the River,
but following erosion it ceased to exist.
We thank those walkers who have come forward to offer
evidence in support of the diversion of the footpath, but the evidence
from a few more users would be useful. If
you are able to help then either contact Marian Owen (Chorley Group
Footpath Secretary, Tel: 01257 265857 Email: marianowen123@aol.com) or me.
FUTURE OF AREA NEWS
This
is probably the last edition of Area News that I will produce. Kevin
Matthews (Area Chairman) will produce the next Area News. Kevin is from
Nottingham, so it is likely that the format will change to something
similar to that used in the Nottingham Area. Any articles for the next
Area News should be sent to Kevin at 32 Hampshire Rd, Walton le Dale,
Preston, PR5 4NH.
COASTAL ACCESS - PILLING
In April the Maritime Bill was
published which contained 301 clauses, but only 19 concerned walking.
However it was these clauses that concerned walking that made the
headlines in the newspapers.
One
of the places that the RA would like to see better access to is the
Pilling Embankment. First a few details about the Embankment -
1)
Planning permission was granted in March 1980
2)
Work started June 80
3)
At 1981 prices it cost £2.2m, with the landowners contributing £324,487
– 15%.
4)
The Embankment was substantially complete in April 82
5)
We believe it to be a structure owned by a public body (Environment
Agency) that is located on private ground.
6)
The original plans were for a public footpath from the east of Fluke Hall
and Pilling to the picnic site, plus another public footpath to the east
of the picnic site going to Mill House, which would linked up with an
existing public footpath.
7)
The final plan was only for a seasonal path to the west of the picnic
site; and for no path to the east of the picnic site. Dogs were to be
banned.
8)
Designed and built in the days when conservation interests had a lower
profile. Restrictions were for the benefit of sheep.
9)
In subsequent years arguments over dogs. The agreement stated ‘no
dogs’, but the authorities took no action to enforce this. Either the
‘no dogs’ clause should have been abolished, or the authorities should
have taken action to enforce it. If the restriction can be justified then
an afternoon spent once a month on enforcing the restriction should have
been adequate to get the message over. The present situation gives this
particular access agreement a poor image. Fortunately access agreements in
other places have worked better.
10)
The Lancashire Coastal Way at this point is sometimes referred to as the
‘inland coastal way’, because it is so far from the coast.
11)
One of the benefits of the Embankment for the public is that the A588
(main road from Hambleton to Lancaster) is no longer subject to flooding
on the highest of high tides.

In
July members of the Lancashire Local Access Forum plus members of the
Ranger Service met at the Picnic Site. A tour of the site was done and
then a walk along the Embankment to the west of the Picnic Site.
The
Picnic Site suffers with anti social behaviour in the evenings, especially
at weekends. The Ranger Service like the idea of having gates that can be
locked early evening, so that the site is effectively closed. The number
of incidents has been significantly reduced. It looks like a case of
tackling the symptoms rather than tacking the real problem, for it is
small number of badly behaved young people who do these acts; not the
Picnic Site.
MID
LANCASHIRE
Area
News –
Summer
08 Number
88
ACCESS TO THE FELLS
Following
the passing of CROW (Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000), many of us
were looking forward to the commencement of the access provisions in Part 1
of the Act. Sep 04 saw the commencement of access to open country, when we
were able to visit previously forbidden fells.
In
Bowland the authorities erected maps at the main access points showing the
extent of the access land, access points and public rights of way, but not
showing walls or fences. The result was that where only one fence existed it
was possible to make a good guess as to where the access point existed.
Where a plural of fences existed it became guess work as to where the access
point was actually located and which pieces of open country it actually
connected.
The
authorities then added a notice at bottom showing the places where dogs were
restricted which made the whole notice board look a mess.
In
the South Pennines and the West Pennine Moors they erected notices which
showed the extent of access land and public footpaths. They did not show the
access points and neither the walls or fences, which meant that from a
practical point of view they were useless. However the maps in the South
Pennines did show where dogs were restricted, which is the best depiction of
this information we have seen. No such restrictions exist in the West
Pennine Moors.
Following
complaints from users, Lancs CC then produced posters for use in rural
information centres, showing the access land, access points, public rights
of way and fences, which was a useful step in the right direction.
Unfortunately our joy was short lived for in most rural information centres
these notices were taken down and replaced by some other notices. They did
however survive in two information centres these being Wycollar for the
South Pennines and Rivington for the West Pennine Moors.
When
it became apparent that we were less than impressed with this situation,
staff in Lancs CC decided that they would add this information to their
MARIO system (an internet site, http://mario.lancashire.gov.uk/
which needs broadband with a modern browser in order to use it). In late
2007 they gladly stated that the information had been added to the MARIO
system, but on trying to use it I found that –
i)
At a scale of 1:25,000 it showed the access land, access points and public
rights of way, but not the walls or fences.
ii)
At a scale of 1:10,000 it showed the access land, public rights of way and
the walls / fences but not the access points.
This
resulted in yet another letter to Lancs CC stating that something better is
required. At the time of writing they have stated that they intend to do
further developments to the MARIO system, but they have not stated a date as
to when this is expected to happen.
Whilst
we have expressed our wish in Lancashire for a better system for providing
information about access opportunities following CROW, the situation in
other authorities appears to be no better than that in Lancashire. This is
clearly something about which we will need to continue to campaign about.
ALAN
HOWARD
A personal appreciation by Tony Clarkson
Those
of us with long memories will remember Alan Howard when he was chairman of
Mid Lancashire from its inception in 1979 until his retirement to Shropshire
in 1991. My own involvement with the Ramblers Association began in 1977, and
at that time people (not just RA members, but also those in positions of
authority in local government) spoke in awe of this man who had led the aims
of the RA as chairman of Preston & Fylde Group.
It
was Alan who determined that we should separate from Lake District Area and
become an Area in our own right. In doing this, we increased our membership
by 33% almost overnight and we have never looked back. The Area almost
became Central Lancashire Area, but it was Alan who pointed out that this
name was too close to Central Lancashire Development Corporation - which
would never do - so we became Mid Lancashire. Even after this decision,
there was detailed discussion about whether or not there should be a hyphen
and the absence of the hyphen was eventually a committee decision.
Alan
first became involved in the Ramblers’ Association in the 1960s when his
work as a graphic designer took him to Preston.
He joined the RA and attended his first meeting of the Preston and
Fylde Group, only to find he had been elected chairman (a familiar story).
Thus began his long association with the RA.
He attended his first RA national AGM in 1976 where he delivered a
brilliantly witty speech in moving a motion calling on the government to
ensure that path users were not endangered by bulls.
He was subsequently elected to the executive committee. It
was the first of many brilliant speeches which Alan was to make in that
forum, often railing against motor vehicles.
He once likened motorbikes revving up on the hills to ‘a flatulent
dinosaur’.
His
skill in graphic design was a tremendous asset to the Area. The leaflets for
the ‘Forbidden Britain’ campaigns for the Ribble Way rally of 1986 and
the River Alt rally of 1988 were all his work, as was the cover and maps for
the first edition of the Round Preston Walk.
In
1982, after a long campaign to persuade the County Council to adopt the
Ribble Way as a recreational footpath, he defiantly led the launch of the
‘Interim Ribble Way’ and it was, again, his artwork which became the
leaflet for that event and, perhaps more importantly, the logo for the
Ribble Way which is still in use today. Eventually, the County Council
adopted the Ribble Way and the official opening was at Clitheroe in 1985.
The Way is, unfortunately, still using the ‘interim’ route and does not
have the full access to the river bank which Alan envisaged.
He
firmly believed in the use of public transport for rambles, and at all
times. In 1975 he helped to
start the Lancashire Rail Rambles programme, and he would lead town trails
from railway stations: if you stayed to the end of the Settle-Carlisle line
you might be rewarded by Alan’s fascinating tour of Carlisle. Keen on urban walking, in 1975 he published a leaflet ‘A
plea for urban footpaths’.
After
moving to Shrewsbury, Alan continued his involvement with the RA and became
involved with the Civic Trust. His fascination for languages, and his
fluency in Welsh, led him to become deeply involved in the RA in Wales and
he organised a rail rambles programme based on Shrewsbury and using the
Cambrian, Central Wales, Marches and Chester-Shrewsbury lines.
Following
two strokes, Alan Howard died on the 14th April 2008 and I was privileged to
attend the celebration of his life on the 24th April. In ways concerning the
rights of walkers and dealings with those who would interfere with those
rights, he was my mentor. Alan was a friend of us all, and we shall miss his
intelligence, wit, outspokenness, stubborn determination, and lovely
twinkle.
MID
LANCASHIRE
Area
News – Early 08 Number
87
ULNES WALTON FOOTPATH
Can you help us save this Footpath
However
on a few occasions these precise definitions have worked against us, these
being mainly when either (i) coastal erosion occurs or (ii) a river changes
course. Where the landowner is enlightened the footpath is rerouted onto a new
alignment with the minimum of hassle. Should the landowner have a dislike of
footpaths it can be an opportunity for such landowners to state the line of
the footpath is no longer walkable and effectively close the footpath, for we
have no right to deviate from the defined line of a footpath.
In
the case of part of Ulnes Walton footpath number 8 going roughly ENE from
Ulnes Walton Bridge on Ulnes Walton Lane (Grid Ref 508198) near the junction
with Holker Lane. On the OS map is shown a footbridge (Grid Ref 513196) but
this no longer exists. It is still possible to walk this footpath, but you
must be reasonably agile, for it means climbing down to the bottom of a wide
ditch and then back out again. The River Lostock is slowly eroding its
southern bank at this location, so even this option may not be available in a
few years time.
Note
- Ulnes Walton footpath number 8 starts at Ridley Lane (Grid Ref 497196) and
follows the south bank of the River to a footbridge at (517200), this being
the junction of a few paths.
Staff
at Lancashire CC have proposed a diversion, which will move the footpath over
this ditch a few yards south away from the River Lostock, to a location where
it would be possible to provide a new bridge over the ditch. The farmer is
objecting to this diversion. By inference it would appear that the farmer
would prefer for this footpath to be deleted. A state of deadlock appears to
exist.
The
RA has been advised to prepare for a public inquiry into the diversion.
Therefore we are seeking evidence from walkers who have either walked this
path previously, or have used this path in recent times with difficulty and
would prefer to see something better than what presently exists. If you are
able to help then either contact Marian Owen (Chorley Group Footpath
Secretary, Email: marianowen123@aol.com, Tel: 01257 265857) or me.
Some
members may remember the case on the River Lune a few years ago when the River
Lune to the east of Caton changed course. For a period it was not possible to
walk the footpath on the south bank of this River. Eventually an agreement was
made which allowed walkers to use this pleasant footpath again.
It
is our belief that the law needs changing so that when erosion occurs that the
rerouting of a footpath can be quickly achieved. This should be something for
a future Countryside Bill, but in the meantime where erosion occurs and the
landowner is unenlightened then we will need to campaign to have the footpath
rerouted onto a new alignment.